Classification of knots involves two aspects:

The first usually involves transforming one diagram of the knot into another. The second involves the more subtle point of deciding when such a transformation is not possible. Such a decision involves the notion of invariants.

We deal with four invariants in our presentation:

We also mention briefly the new knot polynomials which enable one to distinguish easily between a trefoil and its mirror image. The advantage of the four invariants we deal with in detail is that they can be easily presented at this level, and that they suggest many detailed exercises and examples which people can try for themselves.

The further point made by the discussion of invariants is that we do not claim to give a complete set of invariants, that is, we do not have some method of distinguishing all possible knots. A totally different approach to invariants is given by the method of paths and loops. Again, this does not give a complete set of invariants.

Thus many problems remain in the theory, and this again is a point which is easily conveyed. We do want the reader to see that mathematics is, and will continue to be, an open-ended activity.

More generally, mathematicians are not among those who expect that some new theory will come along which will somehow answer all our questions, a kind of `general unified problem solver'. We do expect to find new ways of looking at and solving old questions, to find new questions, and to find new, surprising and beautiful intricacies of patterns, structures and relationships at which to marvel.

| Crossovers | Unknotting | Bridge Number | Colouring Knots | Classification | Paths and Loops |

© Mathematics and Knots, U.C.N.W.,Bangor, 1996 - 2002
This material may be used freely for educational, artistic and scientific purposes, but may not be used for commercial purposes, for profit or in texts without the permission of the publishers.